Rowynn's Digital Garden

Een selfie van Rowynn, met krullend haar, een bril en sieraden in een kamer.
Rowynn Sewkaransing

Ethical creative developer in training, that's fighting for a more inclusive, accessible web.

(they/them)

πŸŒ±πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆπŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡·πŸ‡³πŸ‡±


Hello!

Welcome to my digital garden. A garden of interests, ideas and experiemnts I'm going to try and maintain and tend to for the next two years during my time at AUAS while I'm studying Frontend Design & Development, which is the only two year associate degree programme in the Netherlands that teaches you how to create and build websites in this modern day and age that's tainted by generative AI, vibe-coded websites and the same generic designs that can be found everywhere.

Similar to the lecturers at that programme, I love the web and I want to create memorable experiences with the limited time we have on this planet. For some that's decades, for others it's only a few years.

What's a Digital Garden?

On October 17, 2015, Mike Caulfield published an essay online known as The Garden and the Stream, which while I haven't read it myself, I attended a lecture by Justus Sturkenboom, a real nerd that was yapping for about an hour on how he missed the original, indie web he grew up with and how it's been tainted with by these large corporations that are making a huge profit off of you through the 'algorithm' constantly showing you advertisements which of course, in it of itself are based off of your browsing habits on those sites.

In particular, Justus argues that websites owned by companies like Meta and X are the ones directly to blame for taining the world wide web, by making it so rather than that you're discovering what's on the internet, you're primarily interacting and submitting forms. There's credibility to this claim: Think about how one would go about posting something on Instagram, X/Twitter, BlueSky or Facebook. In essence, you're essentially submitting a form which is rendered like a post for the rest of the world to see, but only those that fall in line with what that website's algorithm would want to push towards other users.

That in particular is important, because if we think back on how the shitshow that was the US Presidential Elections of 2024, Elon Musk spent billions of US Dollars to push conservative republican views onto its users which skewed the algorithm so that Twitter/X uses to supress liberal, left-leaning or democratic views on the platform. And that's besides the investments he has made in Donald Trump's campaign.

This only reinforces Justus's other argument: The content you create on those platforms are not owned by you, nor is there any guarantee that they would have your interest at heart. If you publish your content on those social medias, you're beholdend to whatever the current owners current terms and policies, but owners are subject to change with time. No one thought that Twitter would fall into Elon Musk's lap, yet it did, only worsening the platform in it's already sorry state at the time.

The indie web is a solution to this problem. By creating and managing your own website, you are giving yourself the opportunity to foster a home for your own content to thrive, without being subject to another company's terms and services, or being silenced by them due to the views of their current owners. The best way to do this is by using the POSSE method, where you publish on your own site, yet syndicate elsewhere. That means if you want people to see your recent thoughts on something, you post about it on the social media your friends already use, but for your 'full thoughts', link to your site with the associated post. The same can be done with photos! You pick a single photo you like, but if people want to see your full gallery, refer them to your website.

That way, step by step you'll carve your own path on the web.